It is time we introduce “Humanity’s Best Exam”—a benchmark that strives to capture a model’s capacity to address public ...

The Supreme Court preserves preventive services coverage but emboldens the HHS Secretary.

Kennedy, a case that concerns how hospitals that treat a large share of low-income patients are paid by the Medicare program.

Scholars examine the dangers of difficult-to-understand AI in criminal investigations and cases. Artificial intelligence (AI) ...

The Supreme Court runs afoul of its own equal protection doctrine by ignoring explicit classifications.

Scholars and practitioners examine the Court’s most important regulatory decisions of this past term.

When a project like the rail line has significant environmental impacts, NEPA requires a “detailed statement” that discusses the project’s negative environmental effects and reasonable alternatives.

Scholars consider the antitrust implications of advances in AI-driven algorithmic pricing.

Lawrence O. Gostin discusses the importance of equity and science in the face of threats to global health security.

The Supreme Court allows Department of Education layoffs, a federal court upholds a mifepristone ban, and ...

Scholar argues for an approach to regulating artificial intelligence centered on mental health.

Recent legislation could protect pregnant workers who choose to have an abortion.